Engineers Bring 'Invisibility' One Step Closer to Reality
Posted on: Monday, 2 April 2007, 17:15 CDT
Researchers using nanotechnology have taken a step toward creating an "optical cloaking" device that could render objects invisible by guiding light around anything placed inside this "cloak."
The Purdue University engineers, following mathematical guidelines devised in 2006 by physicists in the United Kingdom, have created a theoretical design that uses an array of tiny needles radiating outward from a central spoke. The design, which resembles a round hairbrush, would bend light around the object being cloaked. Background objects would be visible but not the object surrounded by the cylindrical array of nano-needles, said Vladimir Shalaev, Purdue's Robert and Anne Burnett Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering.
The design does, however, have a major limitation: It works only for any single wavelength, and not for the entire frequency range of the visible spectrum, Shalaev said.
"But this is a first design step toward creating an optical cloaking device that might work for all wavelengths of visible light," he said.
Research findings are detailed in a paper appearing this month in the journal Nature Photonics. The paper, which is appearing online this week, was co-authored by doctoral students Wenshan Cai and Uday K. Chettiar, research scientist Alexander V. Kildishev and Shalaev, all in Purdue's School of Electrical and Computer Engineering.
Calculations indicate the device would make an object invisible in a wavelength of 632.8 nanometers, which corresponds to the color red. The same design, however, could be used to create a cloak for any other single wavelength in the visible spectrum, Shalaev said.
"How to create a design that works for all colors of visible light at the same time will be a big technical challenge, but we believe it's possible," he said. "It is clearly doable. In principle, this cloak could be arbitrarily large, as large as a person or an aircraft."
The research is based at the Birck Nanotechnology Center at Purdue's Discovery Park.
Other researchers published findings in 2006 describing the mathematics generally required for the optical cloaking device. Those researchers include: John Pendry at the Imperial College in London, along with David Schurig and David R. Smith at Duke University, and simultaneously, Ulf Leonhardt at the University of St. Andrews in Scotland.
"These mathematical requirements were very general, and then we determined how to fulfill the requirements with a specific design," Shalaev said.
Leonhardt, a professor of theoretical physics, wrote a commentary piece about the Purdue paper appearing in the same issue of Nature Photonics. In the commentary, he compares the Purdue design to the Roman creation of "the first optical metamaterial," a type of glass containing nanometer-scale particles of gold. In ordinary daylight, a cup made of the glass appeared green, but then it glowed ruby when illuminated from the inside.
The Purdue research, Leonhardt writes, represents " ... theoretical simulations that show that a modified Roman cup based on modern nanofabrication technology will act as an invisibility device ... Any object you put inside will disappear as if dissolved in air, provided it is viewed through polarizing tinted glasses of precisely that colour."
Other researchers have developed concepts for cloaking objects smaller than the wavelengths of visible light and for objects detected in the microwave range of the spectrum, which are much larger than the wavelengths of visible light. But the new design is the first for cloaking an arbitrary object in the range of light visible to humans.
"What we propose is the cloaking of objects of any shape and size," Shalaev said.
Two requirements are needed to render an object invisible: Light must not reflect off of the object, and the light must bend around the object so that people would see only the background and not the cloaked object itself.
"If you satisfied only the first requirement of preventing light from reflecting off of the object, you would still see the dark shadowlike shape of the object, so you would know something was there," Shalaev said. "The most difficult requirement is to bend light around the cloaked object so that the background is visible but not the object being cloaked. The viewer would, in effect, be seeing around, or through, the object."
The device would be made of so-called "non-magnetic metamaterials." Meta in Greek means beyond, so the term metamaterial means to create something that doesn't exist in nature. Unlike designs for invisibility in the microwave range, the new design has no magnetic properties. Having no magnetic properties makes it much easier to cloak objects in the visible range but also causes a small amount of light to reflect off of the cloaked object.
"But this could, in principle, be offset by other means, for example, with antireflective coatings," Shalaev said. "The big challenge is how to make rays bend around the object, which we have described how to do in this paper."
A key factor in the design is the ability to reduce the "index of refraction" to less than 1. Refraction occurs as electromagnetic waves, including light, bend when passing from one material into another. Refraction causes the bent-stick-in-water effect, which occurs when a stick placed in a glass of water appears bent when viewed from the outside. Each material has its own refraction index, which describes how much light will bend in that particular material and defines how much the speed of light slows down while passing through a material.
Natural materials typically have refractive indices greater than 1. The new design reduces a refractive index to values gradually varying from zero at the inner surface of the cloak, to 1 at the outer surface of the cloak, which is required to guide light around the cloaked object.
Creating the tiny needles would require the same sort of equipment already used to fabricate nanotech devices. The needles in the theoretical design are about as wide as 10 nanometers, or billionths of a meter, and as long as hundreds of nanometers. They would be arranged in layers emanating from a central spoke in a cylindrical shape. A single nanometer is roughly the size of 20 hydrogen atoms strung together.
Although the design would work only for one frequency, it still might have applications, such as producing a cloaking system to make soldiers invisible to night-vision goggles.
"Because night-imaging systems detect only a specific wavelength, you could, in theory, design something that cloaks in that narrow band of light," Shalaev said.
Another possible application is to cloak objects from "laser designators" used by the military to illuminate a target, he said.
Leonhardt says in his commentary that creating a cloak for rendering total invisibility in the entire visible spectrum would require "further advances in optical metamaterials, new combinations of nanotechnology with highly abstract ideas ..."
The optical cloaking research is an indirect spinoff of research in Shalaev's lab that has been funded by the U.S. Army Research Office to develop metamaterials. In previous work, Shalaev's team created a metamaterial that has a "negative index of refraction" in the wavelength of light used for telecommunications, a step that could lead to better communications and imaging technologies. More recently, the researchers moved the wavelength for a negative refractive index material to the visible range.
---
On the Net:
User Comments (33)
| 33. |
Posted by umesh on 04/13/2007, 01:39 it will be very useful in future |
| 32. |
Posted by Greg Davis on 04/03/2007, 21:26 Good article, I don't think we'll have to wait 200 years to get this technology realized. |
| 31. |
Posted by freddie on 04/03/2007, 18:03 to me, it sounds like a lot of wishful thinking. for the light to be refracted around a body, means that paritially speaking, light will be absorbed, maybe enough to be noticed to the naked eye, but if not, then indefinitely, a "defence" mechanism could easily be implemented and make your trek invaders look like sitting ducks. jesus the things people do these days to make a living (...). engineers -no, fantasy writers -more likely. |
| 30. |
Posted by Tom on 04/03/2007, 16:38 What is the deal with the asterisks in the middle of words on some of these posts? What's wrong with the word mani****te that p-u-l-a has to be edited out? This site sucks. That's s-u-c-k-s in case I'm edited. |
| 29. |
Posted by Crunshii on 04/03/2007, 16:36 If you need CPU power for this process use the PS3 folding @ home technology :) |
| 28. |
Posted by Anonymous on 04/03/2007, 16:34 @Akufen: Step 1. Use Firefox Step 2. Ctrl + Enuff said. |
| 27. |
Posted by Akufen on 04/03/2007, 16:20 "Come on, webmaster! At least size the text in ems, so we can mani****te the text size in order to read it." Ctrl + scroll ? |
| 26. |
Posted by chris on 04/03/2007, 15:51 I Hope they dont misplace the device. it would be a ***** to find ... |
| 25. |
Posted by nirad on 04/03/2007, 15:47 are these the same purdue scientists that created desktop cold fusion? |
| 24. |
Posted by Sam on 04/03/2007, 00:53 Talk about nano needles... how about the nano text on this web site. Six pixel characters should be reserved for the bottom of a loan application. Come on, webmaster! At least size the text in ems, so we can mani****te the text size in order to read it. |
| 23. |
Posted by Plato\'s Caveman on 04/03/2007, 00:46 I\'d like to wear these nano-needles whilst at my next engineering meeting. All I need is an acoustic cloaking device, so they cannot hear me snore. |
| 22. |
Posted by Jo on 04/03/2007, 00:43 It\'s not that hard..3 primary colors, such as in a rear projection TV....add it up? |
| 21. |
Posted by Oddvark on 04/03/2007, 00:22 So, this thing works by light not reaching the object inside the cloaking area. Your eyes work by light entering them, after reflecting off things. So a cheap way to cloak is to hand out blindfolds to everyone, because inside the cloak, you couldn't see out, just like people outside can't see in. |
| 20. |
Posted by Rojer Clotz on 04/03/2007, 00:19 Randy is a noob. He thinks Rome was built in a day. |
| 19. |
Posted by Samuel Bradley on 04/03/2007, 00:19 Ken Lay used this technology last year and disappeared. |
| 18. |
Posted by cytoplasm on 04/03/2007, 00:19 yeah we have way too many lawyers in a system created by lawyers for lawyers in an effort to get lawyers rich. we need more engineers! |
| 17. |
Posted by mike on 04/03/2007, 00:01 Big Deal! The Romulans have used this technology for centuries. |
| 16. |
Posted by rootvg on 04/02/2007, 23:47 Lieutentant Commander Scott, please call your office... |
| 15. |
Posted by cool hand luke on 04/02/2007, 23:42 Clinton supporters have invested money to use this technology against rival Obama |
| 14. |
Posted by Dennis H Cowdrick on 04/02/2007, 23:31 What a bunch of hooey. This stuff is a REHASH of artificial dielectrics which was well developed 20 to 30 years ago. Wide band solutions to making a surface vanish have been well know for years. Just look up Artificial Dielectrics at the IEEE. If there is any crime here it is for paying again for old technology. |
| 13. |
Posted by Danger Frog on 04/02/2007, 23:30 Hopefully we can cloak Rosie and Streisand with it! |
| 12. |
Posted by Alexandron on 04/02/2007, 23:26 A songwriter's development cost is a sheet of paper and a pencil. It is copyright protected for the life of the writer plus 75 years. The development cost for life saving drugs and new products often run into the billions and the patent is only good for about 17 years. With such wisdom we need to make Congress disappear. |
| 11. |
Posted by Wizzbob on 04/02/2007, 23:24 WOW! Star Trek here we come. Nano technology is a bit frightening, but this appears to be a baby step in the direction of a vast frontier in science and engineering. I hope the research continues andf I look forward to even greater discoveries in the field. |
| 10. |
Posted by John B. Lately on 04/02/2007, 23:10 Most of us don't follow the math, and we know enough of the jargon to be impressed - in some cases, negatively. But aside from hiding (whether militarily or through some nefarious use), perhaps one of the best applications for this cloak would be to cover our slums, or blanket our tree-stripped forests, or hide our filth covered beaches. Maybe you have more ideas? |
| 9. |
Posted by Daniel on 04/02/2007, 23:08 I think Al Qaida already had this technology for years. It works very well for Bin Laden. |
| 8. |
Posted by Brett on 04/02/2007, 23:01 Reading Randy's comment was like listening to G.W. Bush explain the intricacies of nuclear fission. Painful. I bet he thinks smoking doesn't cause cancer and global warming is just something that gay Jews created. Every modern invention has required an R&D; nanotechology is in its infancy and needs time to develop. This will have practical inventions one day. I know it's difficult for idiots with a fourth grade education to grasp such concepts, but please try. |
| 7. |
Posted by Randy on 04/02/2007, 22:52 Yeah right. I'm sick of these half-baked articles. And are these engineers? No, I think they are rockstar mentality profs looking for more grant money. Even if the metamaterials are ever created the practical difficulties will prevent any tactical application. Something covered with cazillion nanorods of glass or whatever? Look at such a covering crosse*** and it will scrape off. Oh wait, did I see an index of zero mentioned? That means the speed of light is infinity, that might mean something in a mathematical theory but just what does it mean in the physical world? Shalaev needs to learn something about night imaging devices before blabbing about them in public as all such devices are broad spectrum devices whether intensifier based or thermal imaging. |
| 6. |
Posted by Tremtech on 04/02/2007, 22:41 Frankly, this technology sounds terrifying. I can just see it: criminals - not to mention armies - getting their hands on "invisibility suits" and running riot. Of course, techo-optimists always assure us that for every technological threat, there's a technological defense. For example, after an atom bomb goes off, we can . . . well, perhaps do nothing. But who cares. God bless innovation! |
| 5. |
Posted by Mark on 04/02/2007, 22:07 My little sister used to have this Disney online game where the 'bad guys' were lawyers and bankers that would attack you with 'jargon'. It was a great game, I highly enjoy promoting it. |
| 4. |
Posted by Kabir on 04/02/2007, 22:01 Yea Eng_GT, but can we make lawyers disappear? |
| 3. |
Posted by Eng_TG_Lawyers on 04/02/2007, 21:56 Lawyers protect devices and rights... Purdue invested time and money, they have a right to protect it from engineers who like to "borrow" things with out asking. |
| 2. |
Posted by Steve Sparkenickle on 04/02/2007, 21:42 When can I buy one? Is this how they did it on Star Trek? |
| 1. |
Posted by Eng_GT_Lawyers on 04/02/2007, 21:41 More amazing innovations would be occuring if there were MORE ENGINEERS & fewer lawyers! |

RSS Feeds